Anthropisches Prinzip. Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. Log inRegister. State Street Scribe by Jeff Wing Why does the country seem to become more interestingly spiritual as you move from east to west? Out east you have Plymouth . In what is becoming to be one of the worst misuses of science since electronics ended up in Sammy the Singing Sea Bass, defenders of „Intelligent Design“.

Author: Vutaxe Gardalrajas
Country: Vietnam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 23 December 2007
Pages: 443
PDF File Size: 4.73 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.64 Mb
ISBN: 886-3-11713-910-5
Downloads: 81797
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Taugami

Hence everything creates itself through the integration of yin and yang, without the direction of any creator. This is the immortal model of the universe. Many Worlds in One: The strong principle then becomes an example of a selection effectexactly analogous to the weak principle.

Weitere Informationen, beispielsweise zur Kontrolle von Cookies, findest du hier: This page was last edited on 29 Decemberat Fred Hoyle and the 7. Sorry, I answer in german, because I don’t know the relating english terms.

“anthropisches Prinzip” in English

Why People Believe Weird Things: Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions. Also see Gardner Steven Weinberg [48] believes the Anthropic Principle may be appropriated by cosmologists committed to nontheismand refers to that Principle as a “turning point” in modern science because applying it to the string landscape ” [ But we are against religion interfering with science.

Omitted here is Lee Smolin ‘s model of cosmological natural selectionalso known as “fecund universes”, which proposes that universes have “offspring” which are more plentiful if they resemble our universe. A common criticism of Carter’s SAP is that it is an easy deus ex machina which discourages searches for physical explanations.


anthropische Prinzip

A simple anthropic argument for why there are 3 spatial and 1 temporal dimensions. Followers of Carter would admit only option 3 as an anthropic explanation, whereas 3 through 6 are covered by different versions of Barrow and Tipler’s SAP which would also include 7 if it is considered a variant of 4, as in Tipler AlbertoT Serious User Registered: If one insists on the conditions under which things develop and searches for the cause therof, such searching and insistence will never end until one comes to something that is unconditional.

He puts forth his fecund universes theory, which assumes universes have “offspring” through the creation of black holes whose offspring universes have values of physical constants that depend on those of the mother universe. Also, the prior distribution of universes as a function of the fundamental constants is easily modified to get any desired result.

They’re a cultural trait. There are two kinds of dimensions, spatial bidirectional and temporal unidirectional. Roger Penrose explained the weak form as follows:. In its strong version, it is a gratuitous speculation”.

anthropisches Prinzip – English translation – German-English dictionary

This would allow variation in initial conditions, but not in the truly fundamental constants. Page 5 of 5.

The latter principle underlay the steady-state theorywhich had recently been falsified by the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation. Postulating a multiverse is certainly a radical step, but taking it could provide at least a partial answer to pinzip question which had seemed to be out of the reach of normal science: Square root rule by jcl Today at Carter and others have argued that life as we know it would not be possible in most such universes.


If the universe were 10 times older than it actually is, most stars would be too old to remain on the main sequence and would have turned into white dwarfsaside from the dimmest red dwarfsand stable planetary systems would have already come to an end. But if any of these were much different, we could never have come in to exist in the first place.

The world is there for the sake of man.

In my eyes you forget an important possibility that might be well known for all the programmers beneath us: Barrow says that it “[ Paul Davies ‘s book The Goldilocks Enigma reviews the current state of the fine tuning debate in detail, and concludes by enumerating the following responses to that orinzip.

A generic feature of an analysis of this anthropiscnes is that the expected values of the fundamental physical constants should not be “over-tuned”, i.

Ours must be one of these, and so the observed fine tuning should be no cause for wonder. Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe.

Posted in Sex