Originally Posted by Modern_Talking I have both mx and the mackie 24*8 consoles with meter bridge.. I must say I love the mx more. Great budget 24 input 8 bus console for stage or studioSpecifications: Extra 24 input MIX- B Channels, each channel individually 2-band EQ, Gain, Pan and. EURODESK. ®. MXA Version May Technical . BEHRINGER and EURODESK are registered trademarks. ALL RIGHTS.

Author: Zulutilar Mitaxe
Country: Uruguay
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 17 June 2013
Pages: 229
PDF File Size: 16.71 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.12 Mb
ISBN: 920-8-82993-651-1
Downloads: 35761
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudoshakar

I wouldn’t write home about the quality of either.

There are certainly better ones, but they cost 10 times as much! The EQ sounds real bad after about 2dB adjustement, and the preamps are thin and hollow. Results 1 to 10 of For an amateur home studio From what I’ve heard, the most common thing to die is the power supply, followed closely by the internal cabling which can corrode or just fall off the connectors, causing clicks, pops and loss of channels.

I can’t tell if it’s worth it. I would certainly buy it again. The time now is Skin and Language Theme: It is, however, really a recording mixer – many features m8000 clearly pointed towards recording.

The direct outs are particularly useful.

By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Behringer has lost its pro against Mackie, because this table was a carbon copy of Mackie, Behringer for the next version to simply changed the presentation of the table, including changing the knobs couleure to differentiate themselves from the Mackie!!

It has all the features of a big console which rarely have effects! Cookies help us improve performance, enhance user experience and deliver our services. The bar-graph can display either the 24 mic or the 24 line inputs.


USE It’s a classic mixing console But be careful, depending on the version, the direct outs aren’t wired the same way, on the first version they xm8000 post-fader!!

All user reviews for the Behringer Eurodesk MX8000

My critisism was against the first bejringer, the one Mackie sued Behringer for, which is considered to be the “best” MX Pre-amps were pretty good really – perhaps a little noisier than the Soundcraft I replaced it with, but never a problem. Frankly, the EMX is probably a far better built mixer but it’s hard to compare them since it’s a powered mixer with fewer inputs and without the busses.

Unbeatable value for money given its possibilities. Join Date May Location Sweden. Uerodesk make sure, if you do go look at that board, that you fire it up and send signal through it. Otherwise, there’s not much to add.

Faults wise – one channel became ‘difficult’ raising the fader produced no sound, until is would suddenly come on at a near the top of the scale level. Maybe the dumbest question yet??? Pumped back to the Mackie, the MX found in undeniable qualities and his abundant connections can do just about anything you want. You get what you pay for. Just to say I Fully agree with my prdcesseur! They haven’t made this board in quite a while.

Well it is clear that it is still there, the matron, and I never had any technical problem. Well it makes quite a gas plant, worthy of some bikes a lot, but really much more eurodeso. Blue Room Technical Forums Limited. Behringer eurodesk mx Sign in to disable this ad. Would I buy it again?

USE Very, very comprehensive and simple. Opinions on Behringer Eurodesk MX?

Personally, I use the mixer’s EQ for backup vocals and use specific rack gear for the main vocals. The EQ is simple but it works all right. Especially as it is cascadable!


User reviews: Behringer Eurodesk MX – Audiofanzine

We certainly can not compare, but still: The bar-graph is really handy, as well as the dual monitoring section The routing possibilities are huge thanks to the 8 sub-groups, 6 auxs and 24 inline inputs Based on your experience, would you buy this product again?

Yeah, i think i’m going to steer clear and buy something much better. The value for money: A good machine, very interesting opportunity. It was my first “big” console and I haven’t had the chance to compare it to any others. Each channel has two sections, one with simple eq and gain facilities, and the other has the full ones – intended to get tracks back in from a recorder.

Had two fairly major catastrophes with it As a consequence, the 6 auxes are really 4 – the others are in the return path, for headphone monitoring in eurodek studio. Sort by most recent most useful.

Anonymous’s review – Behringer Eurodesk MX – Audiofanzine

I have nothing much to say in this regard, except that the faders on mine feel way too smooth, I would’ve preferred them to offer a little more resistance. If that’s not much difference, I definitely go for the newer, plus eurodedk meter bridge is built in. Headband complete bargraphs option.

MX is a Mackie copy with inferior components. Its separate power supply and weight inspire confidence Two years Did you try any other models before buying this one?