El Chorruelo. Bulerías. Paco de Lucía. Luzía 1/2. = Standard tuning x Falseta 4. Capo. fret 3. 4. 2. 6. 0. (0). 5. 3. 3. 6. 5. 5. (5). 3. 5. 5. 3. 3. El Chorruelo. Bulerías Paco de Lucía Luzía Standard tuning. = x Falseta 4. Capo. fret 3. 0 (0) 6 6 5 5 (5) 2 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 3 3 5 7 5.
|Published (Last):||26 August 2006|
|PDF File Size:||2.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.30 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I mean this would be crazy! But to get the best results, everybody should learn as much as one can from as many teachers or better said: Especialmente porque este es un FORO y esta lleno de muy buen guitarristas profesionales y de muy buena gente muchos que tienen un conocimiento del df al nivel de usted.
But between the lines, i have the feeling that you simply don’t accept any other opinion about ANYTHING other than yours, and that whenever you see such an opinion about something that may differ from yours, you ppaco like it is an attack againts you or disrespect and that everyone wants to be a teacher and a “pilot” now! Why do we have these dee things in Flamenco like “Aire”, “Duende” etc?
Thats not Flamenco imo.
Sure, it is not as good as having a teacher LIVE sitting infront of you and hit on your fingers chorduelo you do something wrong. Remember flamenco guitar is not all about technique, virtuosity and innovation. Yes, i have favourites too.
Nadie esta ‘compitiendo’ y usted es el primero que aporta esa palabra a la discusion, hmm But I do believe Ruben is being a bit closed minded. Not only that but disrespectful towards other players You need assistance in that stage to find a good teacher to avoid learning bad technique and habbit from a self professed wannabe teacher. If so, i apologize.
For example you could have never reached us without internet and may only be teaching few people from Toronto.
That also means such a person uses words everybody understands directly. Chorrueko me a break! We receive 12, visitors a month from countries and 1.
Download Section / Paco de Lucia Repertoire
I would find it a real pitty if we would exclude some guitarists or Styles from beeing good, only because we have an own personal favourite. A medium for open discussion or voicing of ideas. What you say is basically to copy a Style. Por esta razon voy a contestarle en Espanol, asumiendo que es su lengua materna como la mia.
And we could never learn from your Youtube Videos. As you rightly said, internet is very useful, but it is also very dangerous if you do not know how to use it properly.
Why can’t we just teach, play or share our views from our favourite guitarists without runing others directly or indirectly down? I mean you don’t necessarily have to play like a Maestro yourself in order to be able to have an opinion.
Creo que su habilidad como guitarrista y el hecho de conocer a Paco de Lucia personalmente se le ha subido a la cabeza Luciaa respect a good player, especially when they interact in our forum It saddens me to see “ego” become such an easy trap for us to fall into for the so-called sake of information and argumentation.
I admire both and many others.
Flamenco Guitar Royal Conservatory of Toronto Ruben Diaz Official Website
I have a feeling I know who you think is the most bonafide is. And i don’t think that “taste” and “knowledge” should be seperated in Music. Hey Ruben, When you say things in this way it makes it very clear that you yourself feel that some of the teachers and online resources mentioned by Arash are not chorfuelo.
Because i can see that you are a top notch guitarist and teacher. So what is wrong about learning from different teachers, combine things, techniques, combine Styles and finally ADD a little bit of own personality and Style?
I think that would be a real disrespect no? Or that its only “knowledge” which counts. Originality is a quality chorrruelo cannot be imitated. Would this game have any value? I have seen some young Guitarists with incredible and fast technique, but who were totally boring imo and i didn’t feel anything when hearing to them, playing the Guitar with no Soul, with no Aire, with no Duende.
The technique of the language, on the other hand, is something that belongs to all who can understand it sorry, what do you mean?